Scientists have discovered that people from different parts of the world have evolved to digest different types of foods based on where their ancestors lived. People from South Asia developed genes that help them process plant-based foods really well, while people from the Arctic evolved to thrive on meat and fish. This research shows that when people switch to modern Western diets, it can cause problems because their bodies are genetically adapted to their traditional foods. Understanding these differences could help doctors give better nutrition advice based on a person’s genetic background and cultural food traditions.

The Quick Take

  • What they studied: How human genes have adapted to different diets depending on where people’s ancestors lived, and what happens when people eat foods their bodies aren’t genetically prepared for
  • Who participated: This was a review article that examined research on populations from South Asia (like India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh) and the Arctic (like Inuit communities), comparing their genetic adaptations and traditional diets
  • Key finding: People from tropical regions like South Asia have genetic advantages for eating plant-based diets with lots of carbohydrates, while Arctic populations evolved genes that help them digest high amounts of fat and protein from animals and fish
  • What it means for you: One-size-fits-all diet advice may not work for everyone. Your genetic background and family food traditions might mean you digest certain foods better than others. This suggests personalized nutrition based on your ancestry could be more effective than generic diet recommendations.

The Research Details

This was a review article, meaning scientists read and analyzed many existing studies about how different populations have adapted to their traditional diets over thousands of years. They compared two very different environments: South Asia, which is warm and tropical with abundant plants, and the Arctic, which is extremely cold with limited plant food. The researchers looked at genetic studies, dietary patterns, and research on gut bacteria (microbiome) in these populations to understand how their bodies evolved differently.

The scientists examined how genes related to digesting carbohydrates, fats, and proteins differ between these groups. They also studied how traditional foods in each region match up with these genetic adaptations. Finally, they explored what happens when people from these populations eat modern Western foods like processed items and refined sugars, which their ancestors never ate.

This research approach is important because it shows that nutrition isn’t one-size-fits-all. By comparing populations that evolved in completely opposite environments, scientists can understand how our genes influence what foods our bodies handle best. This helps explain why some people might get sick from modern diets while others don’t, and why traditional foods might actually be the healthiest choice for people whose ancestors ate them for thousands of years.

This is a review article that summarizes existing research rather than conducting a new experiment. This means it’s based on what other scientists have already discovered. The strength of this type of article depends on the quality of the studies it reviews. The article was published in Frontiers in Nutrition, a respected scientific journal. Readers should understand that while this gives a good overview of the topic, it’s not reporting brand-new discoveries but rather connecting existing knowledge in a new way.

What the Results Show

The research reveals that South Asian populations have genetic adaptations that make them excellent at processing carbohydrate-rich plant foods. Their ancestors ate lots of rice, beans, lentils, and vegetables, and over thousands of years, their bodies developed genes that help digest these foods efficiently. In contrast, Arctic populations evolved with genes optimized for eating high amounts of fat and protein from fish, seals, and other marine animals. Their bodies became very efficient at using fat for energy, which was necessary for surviving in extreme cold.

When these populations eat their traditional foods, their genes and gut bacteria work together smoothly, keeping them healthy. However, when South Asians or Arctic peoples switch to modern Western diets full of processed foods, refined sugars, and unhealthy fats, their bodies struggle. Their genes are still programmed for their ancestral foods, but they’re now eating something completely different. This mismatch appears to increase the risk of diseases like diabetes, heart disease, and obesity.

The research also shows that gut bacteria (the microbiome) in these populations are different and adapted to their traditional diets. When the diet changes, the bacteria change too, and this disruption may contribute to health problems. The scientists emphasize that these genetic and bacterial adaptations took thousands of years to develop, so our bodies can’t quickly adjust to modern diets.

The review highlights that cultural food traditions aren’t just about taste or tradition—they’re actually perfectly matched to how people’s bodies work genetically. Traditional foods in each region contain the right balance of nutrients for that population’s genetic makeup. The research also shows that environmental factors like climate, available plants and animals, and seasonal changes all influenced which genes became common in different populations. Additionally, the study notes that mixing genes from different populations (through migration and marriage) creates new combinations that might not match any single traditional diet perfectly.

This research builds on decades of genetic studies showing that human populations have adapted to their environments. Previous research has shown individual genetic adaptations (like lactose tolerance in some populations), but this review connects those pieces together to show a bigger picture: entire dietary patterns have shaped human genetics. The findings support earlier work showing that modern diseases are more common when people abandon traditional diets, and they add the genetic explanation for why this happens.

This is a review article, not a new study, so it’s limited by the quality and scope of existing research. Some populations have been studied much more than others, so the conclusions might be stronger for some groups than others. The article focuses on two very different regions, which makes for a good comparison but doesn’t cover all human populations. Additionally, modern life is complicated—people’s health is affected by exercise, stress, sleep, and other factors beyond just diet, so it’s hard to prove that diet alone causes the health differences observed. Finally, as people migrate and cultures blend, it becomes harder to say which diet is ‘right’ for any individual person.

The Bottom Line

Strong evidence suggests that eating foods similar to what your ancestors traditionally ate may be healthier for you than following generic diet advice. If you have South Asian heritage, emphasizing plant-based foods, whole grains, and legumes may align better with your genetics. If you have Arctic or Northern European heritage, including more healthy fats and protein might be beneficial. However, this doesn’t mean you must eat only traditional foods—rather, understanding your genetic background can help you make better food choices. Moderate confidence: This is based on genetic research and population studies, but individual responses vary.

This research is most relevant for people interested in personalized nutrition and those with family histories of diseases like diabetes or heart disease. It’s particularly important for people from South Asian and Arctic populations who are experiencing health problems after adopting Western diets. Healthcare providers should consider this when giving nutrition advice to patients from different backgrounds. However, this doesn’t mean people should never eat foods outside their traditional diet—it means being thoughtful about overall dietary patterns.

Changes in diet take time to show health benefits. Most people might notice improvements in energy and digestion within 2-4 weeks of changing their diet. More significant health improvements like better blood sugar control or weight loss typically take 2-3 months. Long-term benefits for preventing chronic diseases develop over years and decades.

Want to Apply This Research?

  • Track daily servings of plant-based foods (for South Asian heritage users) or healthy fats and protein (for Arctic/Northern heritage users), noting energy levels and digestion quality. Record how you feel after eating traditional foods versus processed foods.
  • Users could set a goal to incorporate one traditional family recipe or ancestral food into their weekly meal plan. The app could suggest traditional recipes based on user heritage and help track which traditional foods make them feel best.
  • Create a ‘heritage diet score’ that tracks how closely users are eating to their ancestral food patterns. Monitor energy levels, digestion, and any chronic disease markers (like blood sugar) over months to see if aligning diet with genetic background improves health outcomes.

This article reviews scientific research about how genetics and traditional diets interact, but it is not medical advice. Individual genetic makeup is complex, and diet is just one factor affecting health. Before making major dietary changes, especially if you have existing health conditions or take medications, consult with a healthcare provider or registered dietitian. This research suggests general patterns in populations but doesn’t determine what’s best for any specific person. Genetic ancestry is complex and doesn’t determine diet in a simple way.