Scientists are starting to agree that ultra-processed foods—like chips, sugary drinks, and fast food—might actually be addictive in a way similar to drugs. This editorial brings together experts to discuss how our brains respond to these foods, how we should define food addiction, and what tools doctors can use to help people. The conversation is important because millions of people struggle with overeating processed foods, and understanding the science behind it could lead to better treatments and support strategies.

The Quick Take

  • What they studied: How ultra-processed foods affect our brains and bodies in ways that might be similar to addiction, and what doctors should do about it
  • Who participated: This is an editorial that brings together expert opinions rather than a study with participants
  • Key finding: Experts are moving toward agreement that ultra-processed foods can trigger addiction-like responses in the brain, especially in people who are vulnerable to overeating
  • What it means for you: If you struggle with eating too much junk food, it may not be a personal failure—your brain might be responding to these foods in an addictive way. This understanding could help doctors develop better treatments and support

The Research Details

This is an editorial, which means it’s a thoughtful discussion piece written by experts rather than a traditional research study. The authors reviewed what other scientists have discovered about ultra-processed foods and addiction, then brought together different viewpoints to find common ground. They discussed how scientists should define food addiction, what signs to look for, and how to help people who struggle with it. This type of article is valuable because it helps organize confusing information and points out where experts agree and disagree.

Understanding whether ultra-processed foods are truly addictive is important because it changes how we think about overeating. If it’s an addiction like drug addiction, then people who struggle with it need compassion and medical help, not just willpower. This editorial helps move the conversation forward by getting experts to agree on basic definitions and approaches.

This editorial appears in Frontiers in Psychiatry, a respected scientific journal. Because it’s an editorial rather than original research, it doesn’t present new data but instead synthesizes existing knowledge. The value comes from expert opinion and the ability to see patterns across many studies. Readers should understand this represents expert consensus rather than proof from a single study.

What the Results Show

The main finding is that experts are increasingly agreeing on several key points: First, ultra-processed foods can trigger brain responses similar to addiction, especially in certain people. Second, we need a clear definition of what ‘food addiction’ actually means so doctors can identify it consistently. Third, current tools for measuring food addiction need improvement. The editorial emphasizes that this isn’t about blaming people for overeating—it’s about recognizing that these foods are designed to be highly rewarding to our brains, which makes them harder to resist.

The experts also discussed how different people respond differently to ultra-processed foods. Some people seem naturally resistant, while others find these foods very hard to resist. They noted that factors like stress, emotions, and past experiences with food all play a role. The editorial highlights that we need better ways to identify who is most at risk for developing this kind of food addiction.

This editorial builds on years of research showing that ultra-processed foods affect our brains differently than whole foods. Previous studies found that these foods light up reward centers in the brain similar to how drugs do. This editorial represents a shift toward more experts accepting this idea and working together on solutions, rather than debating whether it’s real.

Because this is an editorial rather than a research study, it doesn’t present new evidence. It represents expert opinion, which can be valuable but isn’t the same as proof. The field is still working on agreeing about exact definitions and best treatments, so recommendations may change as more research comes out. This editorial is a snapshot of where the conversation stands now, not a final answer.

The Bottom Line

If you struggle with eating ultra-processed foods, consider talking to a doctor or counselor who understands food addiction (moderate confidence). Reducing exposure to these foods when possible and finding healthier alternatives may help (moderate confidence). Understanding that this may be an addiction-like response rather than a personal failure can reduce shame and help you seek appropriate support (high confidence).

People who feel they can’t control their eating of junk food should pay attention to this research. Parents concerned about their children’s eating habits may find this helpful. Healthcare providers working with people who struggle with weight or eating behaviors should understand this perspective. People without these concerns don’t need to change anything based on this editorial.

Changes in eating habits typically take weeks to months to show real benefits. Brain responses to food can start shifting within days of reducing ultra-processed foods, but lasting change usually requires consistent effort over several weeks. Individual results vary significantly.

Want to Apply This Research?

  • Track daily intake of ultra-processed foods by counting servings or using a simple rating scale (1-10) of how much processed food you ate each day. Also note your mood and stress level to see if emotions trigger cravings.
  • Use the app to set a specific, achievable goal like ‘reduce ultra-processed food servings by 2 per day’ or ‘replace one sugary drink with water daily.’ Log when you successfully make this change and celebrate small wins.
  • Weekly check-ins to review your progress and identify patterns. Note which situations make cravings stronger (stress, boredom, certain times of day) and plan alternatives. Share progress with a healthcare provider or counselor for accountability and support.

This editorial represents expert opinion on an evolving area of science and does not constitute medical advice. If you’re struggling with eating behaviors or weight, please consult with a healthcare provider, registered dietitian, or mental health professional who can provide personalized guidance. This information should not replace professional medical evaluation or treatment. Individual responses to dietary changes vary, and what works for one person may not work for another.